Skip to content

The Color Purple – Not the Movie but a Revolutionary Movement

Spread the love


USA Today showed this photo by Olivier Douliery, it portrayed the color purple as the very words handed to them by Clinton, Inc.: “Purple is the blend of red and blue. It’s one of three colors of the suffrage movement. And it has deep ties to Christianity.” Purple was the color of royalty. Nobody but the Roman emperor was allowed to wear clothing of purple. In the Catholic Church, during Lent, the priests wear purple to symbolize Christ is King. So why did the Clintons suddenly wear purple? Were they bowing to democracy yielding to Trump? Her words did not reflect that in the least.

Nonetheless, while there is great speculation that this is the end of Clinton, Inc. and there goes the speaking fees and the billions of dollars donated to the Clinton Foundation by foreign governments, it would be wrong to count Hillary out right now. The word from behind the curtain is that Hillary is far too vindictive to go quietly into the light. She will rage against the loss of her influence that she has capitalized on for so long.

Hillary Clinton will attend tonight an awards ceremony in D.C. where she is being honored by the Children’s Defense Fund she claimed to support back in the 1970s following her graduation from law school. She often touted that role on the campaign trail to claim she cared for children.

political-unrestThe mere fact that you see the color purple with her and Bill is something much more disturbing. She will be trying to keep the money flowing to Clinton Inc by maintaining a high profile to try to disturb the political process as much as possible.

Hillary has deliberately fostered a deep divide within the nation. It was her manipulation of the press that raised Trump to start with because she feared a mainstream Republican candidate. Hillary wanted an extremist she assumed would be easy to beat. Neither Hillary nor Obama have come out to condemn the protests that are even calling for violent revolution. There is nothing more they would like to see but in fact a complete socialist takeover of the United States. Hillary’s links to George Soros has many deeply concerned for it has been alleged that he funds revolutions to buy up industries dirt cheap in the chaos and has been funding the protesters all along paying $15 an hour to march.


There is something that has disturbed me very deeply. The Clintons took the White House on January 20th, 1993. The benchmark frequency derived by the computer on their cyclical ups and down was 23 units. It was precisely on time for 2016 to lose for that was 23 years from 1993. However, we will now have a 3 year reaction with the Clintons and that means Hillary will be extremely vindictive and do everything in her power to overturn Trump for the next election even if she does not run, which cannot be ruled out. The Democrats are proposing Michele Obama for President in 2020 and there has been talk of putting Chelsea Clinton forward to keep the Clinton Inc donations rolling in.


Any way we slice this, it appears the Democrats want to forcibly foster a socialist revolution. If they cannot inject their policies to suppress those who produce, they will do so by whatever means are at their disposal. So just keep an eye out for this trend over the next three years. This is why both Obama and Hillary are silent with the violent protests. This is precisely what our War Model has been warning. Everyone thought it would be the right-wing if Trump lost. They overlooked the left-wing and their efforts to brainwash the youth to do a takeover of government.