Zelensky – The NeoNatzi Frontman

Posted Oct 15, 2025 by Martin Armstrong |

Spread the love

QUESTION: You believe that Zelensky impedes peace with Russia?

ANSWER: Of course, Zelensky, I believe, is a NeoNazi and he gets his instructions from the Neocons and London. He pretended to be Christian, like George Soros, and joked about confiscating the assets of Russians and Jews. He announced he was suddenly Jewish ONLY after he became president.

I believe that he must be forced to have an election and let the Ukrainian people decide. Had the Minsk Agreement been honored, there would NEVER have been a war. It is time to end the propaganda and tell the truth.

Putin initially tried to explain to Zelensky the importance of the Minsk Agreement.

Zelensky has even called for NATO to nuke Moscow in pre-emptive strikes. The hatred in Ukraine of Russians goes beyond all reason. They blame Russians when Stalin was from Georgia, and his right-hand man, who proposed taking the food from Ukraine, which led to the starvation of millions, was in fact a Ukrainian Jew from Liev, Lazar Kaganovich (1893-1991), who most likely wanted retribution against them for their persecution of Jews.

They blame the Russians for the tyranny of Stalin, whom even Lenin warned the Duma that he should not succeed him. It is often rummored that perhaps Stalin poisoned Lenin. By embalming Lenin and displaying him like a saint’s relic, Stalin and the Party leadership transformed Lenin into a secular deity. This “Lenin cult” gave the Soviet regime a sacred center—an object of mass devotion. Stalin positioned himself as the guardian of Lenin’s legacy, gaining legitimacy as Lenin’s rightful heir.

Lenin’s death could have divided the Party—especially since Lenin had warned against Stalin’s rise in his “Testament.” Stalin neutralized that threat by controlling Lenin’s memory. The embalming turned Lenin into an eternal revolutionary, and Stalin used that to suggest continuity between Lenin’s vision and his own rule—even though their policies diverged sharply.

Instead, they latch on to a comment from April 2005 when Putin told the nation that the collapse of the Soviet empire “was the greatest geopolitical catastrophe of the century” and had fostered separatist movements inside Russia that we will also see in the United States and Europe when any centralized government becomes authoritarian. But they have taken Putin’s statements out of context about the Soviet collapse, which was a tragedy for Russians. He said:

“First and foremost it is worth acknowledging that the demise of the Soviet Union was the greatest geopolitical catastrophe of the century. … As for the Russian people, it became a genuine tragedy. Tens of millions of our fellow citizens and countrymen found themselves beyond the fringes of Russian territory.” He also referred to the Chechnya separatist movement that became an “epidemic of collapse has spilled over to Russia itself.”

Indeed, the Donbas region in Ukraine stranded Russians who had moved there for various reasons. They did not see themselves as Ukrainians, and Zelensky banned their language and their Orthodox Christianity, even ordering that Christmas would now be December 25th. This was the greatest tragedy that the Russians were stranded. What the fake news will not report is all the intermarriages, even in Ukraine, between native Ukrainians and Russians.

(ethnic Russians)

Estonia: 20.9 %
Latvia: 25.4 %
Lithuania: 5.0 %
Ukraine: 29.59 %
Moldova: 15.3%
Romania: 0.5%
Bulgaria, 0.24 %

They overlook that Putin was particularly critical of Lenin and said he was not a statesman but just a Bolshevik in 2016. He said that Lenin created “a time bomb under our state.” He also denounced Stalin for the massive purges that killed millions, but noted his role in defeating the Nazis in World War II. Putin also blasted the Bolsheviks for making Russia lose World War I in their quest for power, making Russia suffer defeat by Germany and cede large chunks of territory just months before it lost World War I. “We lost to the losing party, a unique case in history,” Putin said.

As long as our fake news continually reports the Neocon/ NATO propaganda that Putin invaded to take all of Ukraine unprovoked, why should Russia believe anything that comes from the West? A Gallup poll in mid-2025 found that 69% of Ukrainians favor “a negotiated end to the war as soon as possible,” compared to 24% who support fighting until total victory.

The “Gradus Research” poll in February 2025 said that 23% of respondents would vote for Zelensky if elections were held immediately, though the survey also reported many undecided voters.

Peace is attainable, and I believe that the key is to cut off ALL money to Ukraine for anything until Zelensky stands for election. The Ukrainian people should be allowed to vote on the future of their own country. We were denied the right to vote on going to any war, like Vietnam. These decisions are always made in the backroom. What is taking place in Ukraine is no different. Let the people decide their own future, not NATO and London.

Dealing With the Fake News

In a 1958 speech to the Radio and Television News Directors Association, veteran CBS journalist Edward R. Murrow told a room full of TV executives, “We are currently wealthy, fat, comfortable and complacent.” Murrow produced a series of reports that helped lead to the censure of Senator Joseph McCarthy and his trumped-up witch hunt for communists, when it was revealed that he was making accusations without evidence. Murrow was one of journalism’s greatest figures, noted for his honesty and integrity in delivering the news; we have lost so much ever since that standard. Murrow used his position to take on powerful politicians and defend the American people, a free press as envisioned by Thomas Jefferson. He also exposed issues such as segregation and warned that the new TV medium was being used to “distract, delude, amuse and insulate” the public.

The FCC repealed the Fairness Doctrine, which has been rather disastrous. The Fairness Doctrine required that TV and radio stations holding FCC-issued broadcast licenses to (a) devote some of their programming to controversial issues of public importance; and (b) allow the airing of opposing views on those issues. This meant that political programs were required to include opposing opinions on the topic under discussion. Broadcasters had an active duty to determine the spectrum of views on a given issue and include those people best suited to represent those views in their programming. That meant you had to relay both sides of an issue. Today, mainstream media no longer has to be fair. They can spread all the propaganda and only say what the government demands. Hence, nothing that is real is fit for the news if it goes against corporate management or government demands. We are plagued with Terrorism as the excuse to eliminate all privacy, as the excuse to raise taxes. This paranoia is not even as honest as McCarthyism, which at least was about Communists. Today, we are subjected to Obamaism, but nobody will defend the people against exaggerated terrorism.