COMMENT: Marty, I have been with you since 1987. I have watched your Economic Confidence Model blow everyone out of the water, and your critics are just idiots who are either genuinely just stupid or they are paid by the “club” to try to prevent people from listening to you. Anyone who criticizes you is not trustworthy. The world should take notice of what you discovered. I saw your ECM predict the 1987 crash to the day. The Japanese Crash. The 1998 July 20th high in the markets. The 2002 low. There are so many events on the exact day that there can be no dispute that this is not your opinion, yet people try to ignore you, and others hate you. Now, May 15th was the exact day for the peach talks, and June 2nd was Russia’s Pearl Harbor. Everyone should send letters demanding that you get the Nobel Peace Prize for humanity’s sake.
L
REPLY: I understand what you are saying. Yes, I can see that a Nobel Prize might help focus attention on the reality of cycles. However, the Economic Confidence Model is something I bumped into, and I had assumed it would be an average. Never in my wildest imagination did I ever expect that such a model would work precisely to the day for countless geopolitical events, like 911, to the very day, and the same exact frequency picks the events here in May to June 2025.
I just do not know. Do I deserve a Nobel Prize for something I myself cannot entirely explain that exists when all the conventional thinking says that it can’t be? I am working diligently on my next book, the Economic Confidence Model. Perhaps then let the world judge. How many coincidences does it take to prove there is a hidden order lurking behind the appearance of random chaos?
