A migrant group has filed a lawsuit against the Trump Administration to extend Biden-era immigration parole programs. Biden provided undocumented migrants and their immediate families with a two-year parole to live in the US. Donald Trump signed an executive order on the first day of his presidency to end “all categorical parole programs,” but now, an activist judge is blocking his administration’s efforts.
U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani of Massachusetts, appointed by Obama, began blocking the Trump Administration from deporting migrants on a case-by-case basis. Her latest ruling is an attempt to ensure that hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants from across the globe remain in the US.
“This court emphasizes, as it did in its prior order, that it is not in the public interest to manufacture a circumstance in which hundreds of thousands of individuals will, over the course of several months, become unlawfully present in the country, such that these individuals cannot legally work in their communities or provide for themselves and their families,” the judge wrote.
Human Rights First (HRF) supported the class action lawsuit, as the group’s primary purpose is to shape global government policy. HRF is a massive organization with 300 partners spanning across 50 counties. These are the same people who inspired the 2016 Global Magnitsky Act that expanded the original 2012 Magnitsky Act to include more than Russian officials. The Global Maginsky Act permitted the government to sanction individuals, freeze assets, implement travel bans, and outright prevent companies or individuals from conducting business in the US. The European Union, the United Kingdom, and Canada adopted similar measures under the premise of “human rights.” Former President Obama signed both the 2012 Maginsky Act and the 2016 Global Maginsky Act.
Now, this Obama-appointed judge believes she has the right to step outside her jurisdiction and overturn federal orders. If the president had the power to implement these programs, then the president should have the power to dismantle them. Yet another example of a biased judge engaged in legal lawfare. It is also of interest that Judge Talwani donated to Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass. And former President Obama.
The Supreme Court stepped in and overruled Talwani in 7-2 vote that declares the president has the authority to expel 500,00 migrants residing in the US. Associate Justices Ketanji Brown Jackson and Sonia Sotomayor dissented. The case now must be considered by the 1st Circuit Court of Appeals. These activist judges are obstructing the rule of law with their extreme biases. As Schumer admitted, these judges were installed purely to spite Trump and overturn all of his orders. It’s time for the SCOTUS to look into these biased judges and determine if they are fit to judge matters based purely on the rule of law and not their own invisible hands.
