Join Us at the 2023 World Economic Conference in Orlando, Florida!

? Dates: November 17, 18, and 19 ? Location: Orlando, Florida, USA (or tune in from home with our virtual ticket options)

Are you ready to unlock the future of economics and finance? Prepare for an unforgettable World Economic Conference experience in sunny Orlando, Florida! This premier event is your gateway to insights, networking, and valuable resources that will supercharge your understanding of the global economy.

?️ What’s Included for In-Person Attendees:

1. Event Admission: Enjoy reserved seating assigned based on the order of ticket sales, ensuring you have a prime view of every presentation.
2. Presentation Slides: Gain access to the presentation slides from all speakers, allowing you to delve deeper into the topics discussed.
3. Video Recording: Can’t make it to a session? No worries! You’ll receive access to video recordings of all conference presentations, so you can catch up at your convenience.
4. WEC Event App: Connect with the conference on a whole new level. Access presentation slides, bonus reports, recordings, and more via the official WEC Event App.
5. Bonus Conference Materials: Get a package of bonus conference-related materials, including exclusive bonus reports and videos (as provided by Martin Armstrong).
6. Morning Information Sessions: Don’t miss out on important morning information sessions, screened on-site in the meeting room on Saturday and Sunday.
7. Networking Opportunities: Exclusive access to the Event App Networking Feature allows you to connect with fellow attendees, both in-person and virtual, fostering valuable professional relationships.
8. Culinary Delights: Savor delicious breakfast and lunch on Saturday and Sunday, prepared to keep you energized throughout the day.
9. Cocktail Reception: Kick off the conference in style at our Friday evening cocktail reception. Meet and mingle with fellow attendees while enjoying refreshing drinks.
10. Swag Bag: As a token of our appreciation, each in-person attendee will receive a swag bag filled with goodies, including an Armstrong Economics notebook, pen, and an event collector’s mug!

Unable to travel? We also have two different ticket options for those wishing to attend virtually! 

Don’t miss this opportunity to be part of a global gathering of economic and financial minds. Secure your spot at the World Economic Conference in Orlando, Florida, and gain the knowledge, connections, and resources you need to thrive in the world of finance and economics.

Space is limited, so act now and reserve your seat! Visit our Events page to register and join us in sunny Orlando this November.

Now available at all major retailers!

The eBook will be available shortly.

The second edition of “The Plot to Seize Russia – The Untold History” is now available for purchase in paperback and hardcover on Amazon and Barnes and Noble. The ebook will be available shortly.

Book description:

“Take care of Russia,” Boris Yeltsin said as he departed his presidency in August 1999. These words were directed at current Russian president, Vladimir Putin. Yeltsin specifically picked Putin as his predecessor to prevent the takeover of Russia.

So, who was Yeltsin warning against? Newly declassified documents from the Clinton Administration prove that there was a plot to rig the Russian election of 2000. These never-before-seen documents confirm numerous attempts to implement pro-Western policies using the Russian oligarchy headed by Boris Berezovsky.

On the other side were the communists who desired a return to the glory days of the Soviet Union. As one of the largest international hedge fund managers, author Martin Armstrong found himself in the middle of perhaps the greatest espionage, or attempt at a regime change for Russia, in modern history.

The Plot to Seize Russia pulls back the curtain to expose the most extraordinary attempt to seize power in modern history, but with the pen rather than armies. These declassified documents reveal a plot that has altered our thinking about the relations between the United States and Russia. The thirst for power comes seething through every line of these papers that alter our perception of reality, change the course of history, and now threaten us with World War III.

Governments and corporations are expected to borrow a record $29 trillion from global bond markets in 2026, according to the OECD. That is $4 trillion more than in 2024 and twice the amount borrowed only ten years ago. The financial press will present this as evidence that debt markets remain deep and resilient, but 78% of the borrowing by OECD governments will not finance new roads, productive industry, or economic expansion. It will be used merely to refinance debt that already exists.

This is the Ponzi structure underlying modern government finance. Politicians speak as though debt is repaid, but governments almost never repay the principal. When a bond matures, they issue another bond to obtain the money needed to redeem the first one. They then borrow still more to finance the current deficit and increasingly borrow to pay interest on the debt accumulated by previous administrations. The entire system functions only while investors remain willing to roll the obligations forward.

The $29 trillion figure is annual borrowing, not the total amount of outstanding debt. Sovereign and corporate bond markets combined have already reached approximately $109 trillion. The system must therefore absorb an enormous wave of new securities every year merely to prevent old promises from defaulting. This is why the refinancing cycle matters far more than the political debate over whether a technical default will occur. A government can continue paying every bondholder on time while still entering a debt crisis if refinancing costs rise beyond what its tax base can sustain.

Politicians became addicted to short-term debt because it was cheaper than locking in long-term interest rates. The OECD reports that 30-year yields have risen significantly across most countries since 2022, leading governments and companies to issue more short-maturity debt. This lowers the interest bill temporarily but forces borrowers to return to the market more frequently. They are trading today’s discomfort for tomorrow’s crisis because nobody in government wants to admit the actual cost of decades of fiscal mismanagement.

A nation that finances itself for thirty years is protected from immediate changes in interest rates on that debt. A nation that continually borrows at short maturities must refinance again and again at whatever rate the market demands. When confidence falls, the cost resets quickly across the debt structure. A one-percentage-point increase may appear insignificant to some bureaucrat, but applied to trillions in recurring issuance, it consumes hundreds of billions that must be extracted through higher taxes, reduced services, inflation, or still more borrowing.

Central banks are also reducing their government-bond holdings after years of manipulating rates through quantitative easing. This leaves hedge funds, households, and foreign investors to absorb a growing supply of debt. These buyers are more sensitive to price and are not obligated to rescue politicians from their own stupidity. If the yield does not compensate them for inflation and political risk, they will demand a higher return or move their money elsewhere. Government calls this market instability because it cannot stand the idea that its debt should be priced honestly.

The competition for capital is becoming vicious. Governments need money for welfare states, pensions, military expansion, energy subsidies, industrial policy, and the interest on existing debt. Corporations must refinance their own obligations while funding new investment, and the artificial-intelligence race is adding another enormous borrower to the market. Nine major technology companies are expected to issue approximately $1.2 trillion in bonds between 2026 and 2030 as they pursue a combined $4.1 trillion in capital spending. Every dollar absorbed by government debt is capital that cannot finance productive private investment without pushing rates higher.

War will make this rollover crisis far worse. Governments are expanding defense budgets while rebuilding supply chains, stockpiling strategic resources, subsidizing domestic manufacturing, and attempting to reduce dependence on geopolitical rivals. These expenditures are being added to budgets that were already insolvent before the War Cycle turned higher. They are preparing for a global conflict with borrowed money while the cost of that money is rising.

This is why the Sovereign Debt Crisis will not resemble the 1930s or some dramatic bankruptcy proceeding. Governments that borrow in their own currencies can create the money necessary to make nominal payments, but they cannot create purchasing power. They will repay creditors in depreciated currency, force financial institutions to hold public debt, suppress interest rates below inflation, impose capital controls, and search for new ways to trap private savings inside the system. Default will come through the destruction of the currency and the confiscation of wealth rather than a polite announcement that the Treasury has missed a payment.

The movement toward CBDCs and tokenized bonds must be understood within this context. Governments facing a record refinancing burden will want a financial system capable of identifying capital, controlling its movement, and directing it toward approved assets. They will say digital money improves efficiency and tokenized debt provides instant settlement. What they will never advertise is that the same infrastructure can prevent capital from escaping when investors no longer wish to finance the state voluntarily.

The OECD recommends that governments ensure the “long-term sustainability” of their debt, as if politicians who created this disaster will suddenly discover restraint. They will not cut spending until the bond market forces the issue because every expenditure has a constituency and every reform threatens someone’s election. They will raise taxes, manipulate markets, change accounting rules, and blame speculators long before admitting that government itself has become the greatest threat to financial stability.

The world must absorb $29 trillion in borrowing during 2026 while war expands, rates rise, central banks retreat from bond markets, and private industry competes for the same capital. The system remains functional only because confidence has not yet completely broken. Once investors question whether rolling government debt forward is worth the risk, the refinancing machine will seize. Governments do not have $29 trillion sitting in a vault to repay these obligations. They have only the ability to borrow again, tax the public, or destroy the value of money.

Mexico’s economy expanded 1.4% in the second quarter, nearly three times the OECD average of 0.5%. That placed it sixth among the economies in the report and marked its strongest quarterly expansion since early 2022. Yet listen to the political discussion in Washington and you would think nothing exists south of the border except cartels and migrants. There are factories, engineers, suppliers, and entire communities whose livelihoods depend on producing goods for the North American market. Politicians can dismiss Mexico all they want, but corporations making investment decisions have to look at costs, transportation, labor, and access to customers.

Mexico is benefiting from manufacturing moving closer to the United States, with opportunities spreading into the businesses supporting that production. The economy contracted a revised 0.3% in the first quarter before rebounding, and output in the second quarter was 2.1% above a year earlier. Nobody should pretend that this means Mexico has entered some uninterrupted boom. Nor should we attribute the entire rebound to manufacturing when the report identifies primary activities as the fastest-growing sector, expanding 2.4%. The broader point is that a country’s productive potential does not vanish because one quarterly number disappoints. Investment takes time to become capacity, and capacity takes time to become income.

Washington’s mistake is assuming that forcing companies to reconsider China automatically means all that production will return to the United States. A manufacturer must calculate whether it can operate profitably. Moving closer to American customers while retaining a competitive cost structure can make Mexico attractive. Tariffs may change that calculation, but they do not abolish it. Businesses will adjust their operations to survive whatever rules governments impose.

There is also a difference between attracting productive investment and attempting to manufacture prosperity through public spending. A factory must eventually sell something customers want at a price they will pay. Government can borrow to finance an unsuccessful program and then borrow again to conceal the failure. The private business does not possess that luxury indefinitely. Its survival depends on meeting demand, controlling costs, and investing where it expects a return. That discipline is precisely what disappears when politicians convince themselves they can direct the economy better than the people risking their own money.

Mexico can still squander the opportunity. Security, water, electricity, transportation, and predictable rules matter to anyone considering a long-term investment. A cheap workforce is of little use if production is repeatedly interrupted or goods cannot reach the customer. Mexico’s government cannot simply congratulate itself over a favorable growth ranking and assume investment will continue regardless of its decisions. Geography provides an advantage, but government can make even an advantageous location too difficult to operate in.

Mexico’s recovery deserves attention because it brings the discussion back to something governments routinely forget: people need the opportunity to earn a better living. They need employers competing for their skills and customers willing to purchase what they produce. A quarterly GDP ranking will not provide that by itself, but sustained productive investment can. Mexico has an opportunity to turn its position beside the American market into lasting prosperity. The greatest service its politicians can provide is to stop assuming that the wealth created by everyone else exists primarily for government to spend.

The United States has crossed $40 trillion in gross federal debt, and Washington will treat it as another unfortunate milestone before returning to the business of spending money it does not have. The more immediate problem is what it costs to carry that debt. Treasury’s figures show approximately $1.17 trillion in gross interest expense through July, just ten months into fiscal year 2026. That works out to roughly $117 billion a month, or $3.85 billion every single day over that period. These are interest costs, not repayments that reduce the principal. Washington incurs this expense while the debt itself continues climbing.

There are two different interest figures, and they should not be confused. Treasury’s gross interest expense includes interest credited to government accounts holding Treasury securities. The federal budget’s net interest measure excludes those internal payments and includes other offsets. The Congressional Budget Office’s February outlook placed net interest at approximately 3.3% of GDP in 2026, implying more than $1 trillion for the full fiscal year. Even on that narrower measure, Washington is devoting roughly one dollar in five of projected federal revenue to interest. The distinction matters for accounting, but neither number describes a government bringing its finances under control.

The issue was never simply that government had borrowed a large sum. It was that borrowing had become a permanent arrangement, with interest added to budgets already running deficits. Politicians take credit for the original spending, while the cost of financing it survives long after they leave office. Their successors inherit the bill and issue more debt rather than confront the promises that created it.

Consider what refinancing actually means. When a Treasury security matures, its holder must be repaid. If Washington finances that redemption by selling another security, the creditor has changed, but the government has not eliminated the obligation. It has renewed it at whatever rate the market will accept. Borrowing to refinance principal is separate from the interest bill, yet both require continued access to willing buyers. This is why a government can make every payment on time while its underlying financial position deteriorates.

The mathematics of higher rates becomes brutal at this scale. Every additional percentage point on $1 trillion of debt means another $10 billion in annual interest once that debt carries the higher rate. Apply that to successive waves of refinancing and the expense builds year after year. The entire $40 trillion does not reset overnight, and it would be misleading to suggest otherwise. Existing fixed-rate securities retain their coupons until maturity. That delay, however, can conceal the developing burden and give politicians another excuse to postpone action.

There is no magic number at which a country automatically collapses. Confidence, borrowing costs, economic growth, and the ability to raise revenue all matter. The danger is that higher interest expenses require more borrowing, while concerns about that borrowing encourage investors to demand still higher yields. A deteriorating fiscal position can then begin reinforcing itself.

CBO projects net interest costs reaching $2.1 trillion in 2036, or 4.6% of GDP. That is a projection under its stated assumptions, not a guaranteed outcome, but it demonstrates that the problem does not disappear even in an orderly baseline. Washington is not merely struggling with a temporary expense left over from an emergency. It is carrying an interest burden expected to grow while elected officials continue making commitments against future revenue.

War makes this arithmetic harder. Military operations require resources today, while the interest on borrowing to finance them can remain for decades. If conflict also raises energy costs or disrupts production, it can complicate the Federal Reserve’s inflation problem. Higher rates may be necessary to restrain inflation, but they also increase the cost of new federal borrowing. Demanding that the Fed cut rates does not repair that conflict, especially when long-term investors remain free to demand compensation for inflation and fiscal risk.

Republicans cannot explain this away by blaming Democratic spending while defending every unfunded commitment of their own. Democrats cannot promise an expanding government without confronting the cost of financing it. Both parties have constituencies they refuse to disappoint and obligations they prefer to leave to the next administration. The interest bill does not recognize party affiliation, and the bond market does not have to accept a campaign promise as repayment.

The $40 trillion figure should therefore be understood through the income required to sustain it. America possesses enormous productive capacity, but that is not permission for Washington to claim an ever-larger portion of future revenue before the public receives any new service. More than a trillion dollars in annual net interest is already a substantial claim on that income. The question is how much further government intends to mortgage the future before admitting that borrowing has become its substitute for governing.

Netanyahu, I believe, is a sick individual. In 2024, in his Knesset speech, Netanyahu said: “I’ve been warning about Iran for 30 years.”  It was reported on March 3rd, during a visit to a site struck by an Iranian missile, Netanyahu stated: “We read in this week’s Torah portion, ‘Remember what Amalek did to you.’ We remember—and we act.”

In 1 Samuel 15:2-3, God gives King Saul a specific, direct order to carry out this command. The prophet Samuel relays the message: “This is what the LORD Almighty says: ‘I will punish the Amalekites for what they did to Israel when they waylaid them as they came up from Egypt. Now go, attack the Amalekites and totally destroy all that belongs to them. Do not spare them; put to death men and women, children and infants, cattle and sheep, camels and donkeys. ‘”

The harshness of the command in 1 Samuel has disturbed Jewish scholars for centuries, leading to various interpretations that move beyond a literal call for genocide. If Netanyahu believes that genocide is the command of God, that is NOT in the self-interest of the United States. He knows you cannot accomplish regime change from the air. This is the very first time when we are in a partnership with another country who is really calling the shots here where the interests of Netanyahu are by no means the same national interest of the United States.

This Iran War is Netanyahu’s war, not America’s. He is consumed with hatred and he will NEVER stop because he sees only total annihalation of Persia. This has been an ancient feud that goes back thousands of years. We should NOT be involved because Netanyahu will NEVER accept peace so this war will NEVER see a resolution while it is draining the resources of the USA leaving the country vulnerable on a grand scale. The US can be defeated conventionally because of Netanyahu.

Let me make this very clear. The US has bombed the hell out of Iran to the point that the stockpile of conventional weapons has been seriously depleted. I warned from the outset, if I was on the other side of the table, I woud use this war to drain the US as we have used Ukraine to weaken Russia. There is no way to win this war. Iran cannot be bombed into oblivion. Sources familiar with internal data state that the US has fired a vast number of its most advanced long-range missiles. Reports suggest that almost ALL of the Army Tactical Missile Systems (ATACMS) and the newer PrSM have been used during the campaign. These are costly, land-based missiles valued at well over $1 million each.

It would take boots on the ground to secure the Strait of Hormuz meaning you ust occupy 50 miles indland on each side of the Strait permanently. Anyone who is NOT biased can see Netanyahu has dragged us into his endless war trying to fulfill 1 Samuel 15:2-3.

The Persians captured Marcus Crassus, a member of the Triumvirate with Caesar and Pompey, at the Battle of Carrhae in 53 BC. As the legend goes, he was famous as the wealthiest man of Rome, so the Persians poured molten gold down his throat to kill him. The symbolic message was “you thirsted for gold, now drink it.” Then in 260AD, they were the first to capture a Roman Emperor Valerian I in 260AD.

Even during the civil war that followed the assassination of Julius Caesar, Cassius sent Quintus Labienus to join with the Parthians during the civil war asking for their help against Octavian and Mark Antony. They did not arrive in time. Yet, this coin issued by Labienus showed a Persian horse on the reverse.

The Romans were NEVER able to conquer the Persians. They have always been a proud and formidable enemy. Sorry, but I warned that I did not see a change in the government until 2027. The risk here is that they have shifted the real power from the Ayatollah to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), which is an elite military and security force in Iran, established after the 1979 revolution. It was created by Ayatollah Khomeini to protect the new Islamic system from both internal and external threats, serving as a powerful ideological counterweight to Iran’s regular army.

Today, the IRGC is much more than just a military branch. It has evolved into one of the most powerful institutions in Iran, often described as a “state within a state” due to its immense influence over the country’s military, political, and economic spheres. To be part of that they must be the hardline believers. This is far more difficult to negotiate with than an Ayatollah assuming he is even alive. Of course, Netanyahu smiles and claims the Ayatollah is dead as if that is some victory.

Lucius Verus invaded Persia, claimed a victory after sacking two cities. As the Roman army withdrew from the East, it brought back more than just victory. The soldiers carried a lethal disease, which became known as the Antonine Plague. The plague had a catastrophic impact on the Roman Empire. It raged from 165 to 180AD and is estimated to have killed 5 million people, with mortality rates in the army and cities reaching as high as 15% in some areas. In Rome itself, the plague was so severe that it is reported to have caused up to 2,000 deaths per day at its peak. It Even Killed an Emperor: In 169 AD, Lucius Verus himself died from the plague, becoming one of its most high-profile victims.

For Iran to win, they merely have to survive.

But the US is now Vulnerable for the stockpile of conventional missiles has been seriously depleted for a war that cannot be won.

PRIVATE BLOG – Korea the Uninteded Consequence

Private blog posts are exclusively available to Socrates subscribers. To sign-up for Socrates or to learn more, please visit Ask-Socrates.com.

https://ask-socrates.com/

Listen to more on Kerry Lutz’s Substack.

PRIVATE BLOG – Here We Go – Hold On!

Private blog posts are exclusively available to Socrates subscribers. To sign-up for Socrates or to learn more, please visit Ask-Socrates.com.

https://ask-socrates.com/

QUESTION: I have read your report on October. I see the correlation. Was your famous forecast that Communism would fall in 1989, when people thought you were crazy, the result of your 72-year Revolutionary Cycle on Russia lining up with the first 8.6-year wave after the start in 1985? Do we have such a correlation here going into what appears to be a major turn in 2028?

Bob

ANSWER: Yes, when I have multiple models point to the same target, this increases the likelihood that will be important. I have been touting the risk factors here for August since last WEC in November 2025. In addition to this target showing up on numerous markets in the timing arrays that have over 70 individual models to create those arrays, then we have the September turning point on NATO.

I have warned many times that the volatility will rise during the last 3 waves of the ECM. That will begin with NATO as on September 2nd, 2026. I have also warned that they lose their jobs if there is peace and no threat from Russia. So they have done their best to sabotage any peace negotiations and constantly preach Russia wants to invade Europe. The only reason to invade Europe now would be to destroy an adversary. Europe has nothing of value to warant an invasion for the classic economic gain. Thus, any war would be to destroy Europe and Zelensky is trying to bring down Russia. We do not see it as a profitable venture to conquer Europe and then occupy it.

Consequently, once again we have a serious correlation that starts September 2nd. Look at the timing arrays around the world. Many have the week of September 7th as a key week globally suggesting this is not a localized turning point but an international influence.

QUESTION: Marty, you have been targeting the last week of August and the first week of September for over a year on your geopolitical models. I confess, your computer is so amazing; it is unmistakable why they wanted the source code, and you have been really treated with such abuse all because you discovered something you never intended to discover. Here we are with the former Russian deputy foreign minister Andrei Fedorov, who told the BBC’s Newsnight program in response to our latest braindead head of state, Andy Burnham, who promised to supply Ukraine with the blueprints for a deadly, long-range cruise missile.

“In the coming future we will face a new stage of escalation in the Ukrainian conflict, and sooner or later, there might be not only verbal but maybe some visible reaction from Russia towards the UK.”

Within 24 hours, CIA director Ratcliffe was in the air on his way to Moscow to try to prevent war.

What does your computer say now? Should I take my family to Florida?

Paul

ANSWER: Look, we have the stupidest crop of world leaders who I would not trust to babysit my dogs. For years, I looked at the computer forecasts into 2023 and saw how it would escale from 2026 onward. I could not imagine how society would become so stupid to allow this to happen. My recommendation has been to cut off Ukraine ASAP and compel Zelensky to honor the Minsk Agreement and hold elections. Ukraine should be allowed to break up the same as Yugoslavia – plain and simple. This map shows the ethnic differences. The West has been promoting this war and Putin is going to face the Russian State Duma elections, which are scheduled for September 18, 19, and 20, 2026.

The Lusitania was secretly carrying war material for Britain whole the USA was claiming neutrality. The manifest included small arms ammunition and shrapnel shells, but it was primarily a passenger liner that the government was using to hide secreting war materials using civilians as a shield. Saddam did the same in Iraq and Hammas does the same putting military operation in a civilian area. The British government did list it as an auxiliary cruiser as well, but it was not functioning as a troop transport or a heavily armed warship during that voyage.

The famous “Warning Ad” did appear, but it was not placed exclusively in a New York newspaper. The Imperial German Embassy placed a notice in fifty East Coast newspapers, including papers in New York, New Jersey, and other major cities. Crucially, the it was a general warning issued on the day the Lusitania set sail (May 1, 1915), reminding travelers that a state of war existed and that ships flying the British flag were subject to attack. The Lusitania was the key target covered by this general notice.

The Lusitania was sunk by a German U-boat on May 7, 1915. The German government later justified the attack by citing the ship’s status as an auxiliary cruiser and the presence of munitions, but the decision to sink it was a military action.

Finally, Archaeology.org recovered ammunition from the Lusitania, proving once and for all that the Germans were correct. What is incredibly critical to understand here is that the Lusitania was used as bait to get the Germans to sink the ship to justify entering the war.

From the Trenches – Lusitania’s Secret Cargo – Archaeology Magazine Archive

This is one of the oldest tricks in the book. The West instructed the interim Ukraine government in 2014, which they hand-picked, to start the civil war and attack the Donbas. Merkel negotiated the Minsk Agreement in BAD FAITH only to buy time for Ukraine to build an army. When it comes to war, as I have said many times, the first casualty is always the truth.

The EU, Britain, and the United States are fair game when they are proving the very missiles that Zelensky is using to destroy Russia. This is a proxy war and Ratcliffe had better be telling Putin that the USA will NOT allow Ukraine to manufacture Patriot missiles and Britain has better get a big mussel for Andy Burnham to keep his stupid mouth shut.

For many, Ratcliffe’s trip revived memories of former CIA head William Burns’ rare personal visit to Moscow in November 2021, when Burns sat down with senior Kremlin names and the head of Russia’s SVR foreign intelligence service, Sergei Naryshki.

Ratcliffe’s vist was to try to talk Russia down after the stupid remarks of Burnham. However, this is reminesent of former CIA head William Burns, who also made a rush flight to Moscow in July 2022 to warn the Kremlin against launching a full-scale invasion of Ukraine as its troops amassed on the border with its neighbor. The Neocons, NATO, and the EU pray for this war at the foot of the bed before they go to sleep. They probably pray to Lindsey for his intervention to hear their prayers.

The Physical Foundation: Roman Londinium (c. 47–50 AD). The is Constantius coming to the rescue of London. Cyclically, London comes to a HUGE MAJOR turning point in 2028 which is off the charts. Mussel Burnham before he makes that date the destruction of London.

We have Panic Cycle in both Russia and Britain for the week of October 5th as well as in the Euro but not the USA. This implies we are looking at geopolitical tensions that week confined perhaps to EEU vs Russia. Ukraine is out of control. Their drone chief has declined that “Moscow will fall!” Do you really think that Ukraine will defeat Russia and they will raise the white flag and surrender? If they are pushed to that limit, they are pushing the button. If the West does NOT remove Zelensky, this high-heel dancer imitating a head of state, he will take the entire world down with Ukraine.

This is the main they hand-picked to start World War III. He is an international disgrace and threat to the very foundation of Western Civilization. Until the people of Europe rise up and demand that their leaders sever ALL ties with Ukraine, they are putting their own people in the crosshairs all for this incompetent high-heel dancer.

We have a Panic Cycle in Russia in 2027 on the yearly level. Ukrainian officials familiar with the planning previously told the Kyiv Independent that one of the operation’s central political objectives was to look beyond just 40 days and influence
elections in September. This will only support the Hawks. He is really stupid or he is deliberately trying to create WWIII to draw in NATO to destroy Russia.